
Acquired Deafness, it's a conundrum wrapped in the enigma, in that those who acquire deafness DO re-invent themselves, it is the other point of hammering home still, how the disability took away what they had, we are moving on, we are not however lying down and rolling over to it, is the best way I can put it, so this would appear 'denial' I don't believe it is, no more than I believe 're-invention' is the pat solution.
When you are sitting in a quiet moment, then it hits you again. It's a substitute, most of us would prefer not to need. So the mental battle is there constantly. I doubt there is anyone who has completely gone from non-disablement to a profound one, and just looks on it as a hiccup. I don't want to be 'brave' and a 'hero' overcoming my issue, so some patronising person can pat me on the head. I hurt, a plaster won't do, I want it sorted, don't stand in my way. There is misinformation/images that go out. Moving on is not 'moving away' from what you lost. We are positive, positively annoyed the advances are too slow....Thus having the issues of acquirement of disability, the drive to overcome it is stronger in some, and total capitulation in some others, there is rarely any middle ground.
A sure-fire red flag to acquired, is to say 'get a grip' and 'move on', or as some bright spark said "Get a hobby..." !? I said I have one, it is called campaigning against 'deafness maintenance', (where people totally focus on support to the exclusion of eradications and alleviations), and looking for the cure. I think in the support area, everything gets forgotten as to the bottom line, of putting research and 'cures' on an equal footing. Why isn't 30% of all funding going to cure research ?
I embrace genetics/cochlear implants, the latter is the norm now, and for the former, there may be real inroads one day for many to gain useful hearing again. I cannot for the life of me understand why ANYONE would oppose it, or prevent it happening, so we can all sign at each other ? I think not, that's selfish. The recent survey (Top right of my blog re patients in the health area), showed us less than one third of deaf people wanted sign language used for patient communications, the rest wanted lip-reading, yet lip-reading has been zeroed by sign language plugs, it makes no sense. Another 20% did not want an BSL interpreter and they were profound deaf, only 2% wanted an BSL relay option in the Doctors.
The only puzzle as I see it, is that those who acquire and disablement have NO central representations of any kind ? that's the problem, we aren't uniting to make real change, if we did then by sheer numbers we could change the entire face of deaf awareness and disability, (which seems stuck with the wheelchair image). It got to the point where the wheelchair/Ear logos for some reason, intensely irritated me. As a survey response stated, we aren't just ears, we are people. Acquirment isn't represented, it''s time it was..