Maybe the answer is much more simple, deaf aren't signing so much anymore? The only thing that promotes more professionals is more DEMAND for their services, 63% of all deaf still do not use interpreters, some never have, because they rely on hearing family or relations to do it. Attempts to tell the deaf if they want more help they need to create a demand for it hasn't got far, most are lazy frankly, they just find it easier to let the hearing family take the strain of it all.
E.G. A young man in South Wales complained about lack of interpreter support to health and education he was 18 yrs old, when asked how often he needed one, he said 'I've never had to ask for one before, because my Dad/Mam helped me with calls appointments and all that, now they can't and I'm unable to follow. I don't know how to use an interpreter..' The irony, is the main article pertaining to this issue was written by the BDA (UK), who opposed restrictions on family support to increase demand, thus, creating the issue themselves.
We have to question 95,000 alleged BSL users and less than 15% using a terp anyway, to ask how, or what ARE they 'listening' with? With only 1 BSL terp alleged for up to 300 UK deaf, this suggests demand for BSL is pretty low anyway, directly challenging 95% of all BSL campaign statistics. It certainly does not back up online BSL campaigns for more sign or more interpreter support. With health/education areas relying on and encouraging deaf to use family to avoid support costs and the BDA doing nil about it because unprofessional family help is a right, what's the point or the answer?
Basically, family doing a professional job without professional qualifications either, let the deaf down, leave them dependent and vulnerable, at risk, so do their charities, and as regards to individual rights, independence and own decision-making, forget it, you abandoned that when Dad/Mum/children/friends took over, they make the decisions now...... when they can't do it, what then? social workers? (the area deaf disposed of 18 years ago because they oppressed the deaf, and no dedicated deaf SW now exist).
The BDA answer? that old chestnut 'all deaf together' again DOH! They just admitted Deaf don't want that, the clubs have near all closed. We'd like to think the Deaf have moved out of that straightjacket but...
Robert G. Lee is a Senior Lecturer in BSL & Deaf Studies at the University of Central Lancashire. He has noticed the dearth of interpreters:
“There are not enough interpreters and sign language teachers to meet the needs of the community, especially in rural areas there might be very few interpreters or teachers. London, Manchester and other big cities have a higher percentage of Deaf people partly because there are more services but there still aren’t enough interpreters in the right place and the right time. In a rural area there might be a more limited range of interpreters not all qualified to interpret the range of things Deaf people might need, so you might have interpreters good with community work but not legal work so if you needed a solicitor it would be difficult to find the right interpreter.”
Of course, this is true for everyone, cities have always had better public services and more jobs, hence only 6% of British people live in the countryside.
Robert doesn’t think interpreters are badly paid:
“Before I can teach someone to interpret they have to be bilingual and so we need to have a greater number of qualified BSL teachers out there teaching the language. I think interpreting is a fairly well paid job for the level of education required, but not hugely rich.”
Robert pointed out that the decline of Deaf clubs has made it harder for interpreters to learn the full range of BSL. This is because Deaf clubs tend to be attended by Deaf people from all age groups, but since the internet revolutionised social gatherings, Deaf people only tend to hang out with people their own age, limiting the vocabulary that potential interpreters can learn.
A spokesman for SignHealth confirmed that it was very difficult to book interpreters which suggests that there is a shortage.
According to the national union of British Sign Language interpreters (NUBSLI), wages for interpreters have been forced down by government policy. Their committee said:
“We do not believe that the perceived shortage would be the only factor in Deaf people not having access to interpreters, in fact it would be the national framework agreements the current government enforce on public services such as the NHS. These frameworks have forced interpreters’ fees, terms and conditions down to such an extreme that many professionals are unable to accept the work, not that they are not available or prepared to work.”
Logically, the ideal solution would be if the Deaf community all lived together in a few areas. That way they could maximise their political and economic bargaining power. Under first past the post, politicians have little incentive to pay attention to minorities unless they are concentrated in a few constituencies. Maybe that’s utopian and they shouldn’t have to, but those are the cards we are playing with.