Saturday, 5 October 2019
ATR: It's far from clear if (apart from the blind), who can legally take a dog into an area with food etc. This is the first instance we have seen of an Autistic challenging the systems with an assistive dog so a grey area. To some degree, you have to have empathy with business who see the strict health and safety/food laws in tatters as they can get fined for admitting an assistance animal or from preventing entrance to one.
The law needs clarifying, when is a dog a pet, and not an assistive trained animal? If we take the next logical approach to this type of access then EVERYONE with a registered issue will be taking animals into cafes including those with mental health issues, depressions etc... A quarter of the UK population, food outlets will surely then breach all food hygiene laws? And what of other customer rights, not to have animals next to them while they are eating? Can any business insist on who or who does not, enter their premises?
A family was left ‘humiliated’ after their young son who has autism was turned away from a shop because he had his assistance dog with him. Three-year-old Leon Bulner and dad Karsten visited a Londis store with two-year-old dog Fern but said they were told the animal was not allowed in after two ‘disgusting’ exchanges. When Mr Bulner tried to explain that his son has moderate to severe autism, he said the cashier at the store in Hampshire village Weyhill, near Andover, told him ‘no dogs, end of’.
After going back the following day to explain the situation to the manager, he added that he was ‘basically thrown out’ and told that only dogs for blind or deaf people were allowed. He retorted that the shop wasn’t following the law, but Mr Bulner said the staff member replied that it was ‘Londis law’ and that he ‘didn’t care’ about a potential fine. The store’s parent company has since apologised and said they will update their policies.
Friday, 4 October 2019
South Welsh BSL support.
The tail of the official support tape in the UK appears to show huge disparity and inequality of support to the deaf and the hard of hearing, with the latter area being ignored in support terms. If you lip-read or want text support FORGET IT, it doesn't exist. The welsh get just 3 supporters for their 300,000 plus with hearing loss but less than 2000 with deafness issues are served by 48+ interpreters. Why is there NO official agency or area in the UK to suggest HoH, the non-signing areas, or the deafened get any support of note? Or, identify where it is?
Hawaiʻi,Sign,Language,HSL,,also,known,as,Old,Hawaiʻi,Sign,Language,,is,an,indigenous,sign,language,used,in,Hawaiʻi,Although,historical,records,document,its,presence,on,the,islands,since,the,1820s,,it,was,not,discovered,until,very,recently,by,linguists,at,the,University,of,Hawaii2,It,is,the,first,new,language,to,be,discovered,within,the,United,States,since,the,1930s4 Although,previously,believed,to,be,related,to,ASL,5,the,two,languages,are,in,fact,unrelated6,It,was,found,that,eighty,percent,of,the,vocabulary,of,the,Hawaiian,Sign,Language,differs,from,that,of,American,Sign,Language,,proving,HSL,a,distinct,language,from,ASL,However,,since,the,1940s,ASL,has,almost,fully,replaced,the,use,of,HSL,on,the,islands,of,Hawaii4 HSL,,discovered,in,2013,by,language,researchers,,is,an,undocumented,language7,Spoken,by,very,few,people,,HSL,is,at,risk,for,Extinction,due,to,its,lack,of,speakers,and,the,majority,of,the,deaf,population,having,adopted,the,use,of,ASL8,With,only,30,speakers,worldwide,,HSL,is,eight,percent,critically,endangered9,Hawaiian,Sign,Language,is,categorized,as,"nehawaii,i,sign,language,Hawai,i,Sign,Language
Wednesday, 2 October 2019
Carol wasn't sure if Gary was losing his hearing or whether he was ignoring her at first. Then, she started recognizing that he was not partaking in conversations with their kids or friends. Gary's hearing loss started to progress, and he would get stronger and stronger hearing aids, but they were no longer helping him hear. In the video, Carol shares that she "felt frustrated because it felt like I was working harder at being your ears than you were at trying to hear." This growing anger and frustration put a strain on their marriage.
They used to converse at the end of each day and enjoy each other’s sense of humor. As his hearing loss became worse, Carol would only share what Gary absolutely needed to know because it became too hard to communicate. It became very lonely in their marriage. They have an incredible support system, but they missed their conversations with each other, the laughter they once shared and being able to say, "I love you." Gary held on to communication through emails and closed captioning, but he knew that this wasn't the way he wanted to live his life and that there had to be another solution for him.
Tuesday, 1 October 2019
They are closing in on the rogue deaf genes. Researchers have identified 44 genes linked to age-related hearing loss, giving a much clearer understanding of how the condition develops, in a new study led by UCL and King’s College London. Hearing In the study, published today in The American Journal of Human Genetics, researchers analysed the genetic data from over 250,000 participants of the UK Biobank aged 40-69 years to see which genes were associated with people who had reported having or not having hearing problems on a questionnaire.
44 genes were identified to be linked with hearing loss. Co-lead author Dr Sally Dawson (UCL Ear Institute) said: "Before our study, only five genes had been identified as predictors of age-related hearing loss, so our findings herald a nine-fold increase in independent genetic markers. "We hope that our findings will help drive forward research into much-needed new therapies for the millions of people worldwide affected by hearing loss as they age." By the age of 65, one-third of people are affected by some degree of hearing loss which can lead to social isolation and disability and has been identified as a risk factor for dementia.
[Risk Factor does not mean primary CAUSE].
Despite being a common impairment in the elderly, little is known about the causes of the hearing loss and the only treatment option available is hearing aids which are often not worn once prescribed. The findings of this study will allow researchers to determine how the condition develops as we age and may identify potential targets for new therapies. Co-lead author Professor Frances Williams (King's College London) said: "We now know that very many genes are involved in the loss of hearing as we age. This study has identified a few genes that we already know cause deafness in children, but it has also revealed lots of additional novel genes which point to new biological pathways in hearing." The next steps in this research are to understand how each identified gene influences the auditory pathway, providing opportunities to develop new treatments.
Vodacom has unveiled an app that enables deaf and hearing-impaired persons to contact emergency services when they need help.
The app is exclusively available to Vodacom customers. This comes after the mobile operator last year introduced an SMS emergency service for deaf, hearing- and speech-impaired customers. Dubbed the “Vodacom 112 Emergency Service App”, the free application enables deaf users to contact the ER24 emergency contact centre 24 hours, 365 days a year.
Vodacom says users can request emergency services such as fire, police, sea rescue, traffic and ambulance. Karen Smit, Vodacom's principal specialist for specific needs, says: “As an organisation that aims to include all members of society through our different product suites, we realised there’s a gap in the market. Most emergency services are predominantly accessible via voice calls. We recognised that this was a barrier for the deaf and hearing-impaired market segments, hence the birth of this app.” Smit adds it became evident to the company that it needed to address the needs of those that are vulnerable.
The app helps deaf patients better manage treatment Hearing-impaired abuse victims get a lifeline “As a brand that believes in inclusion for all, Vodacom works hard to promote an inclusive digital society, regardless of age, income or disability. “We will continue to launch accessible products that offer solutions to those that need them most.” The app is available for download from the Google Play Store and Apple App Store. Once downloaded, users can register their mobile number for the service.
David Burke waited over 60 years to be able to communicate with the world. And with the help of relatively new technology, that wait is over. Burke is deaf.
The 66-year-old Winnipegger said that for most of his life he had very few options when it came to connecting with people. "If I was sick I would still have to physically go to work, inform them that I was sick and then return home. If I wanted to go visit a friend I would have to physically go to them and see if they're home, and if they weren't home, I would have to come back," Burke said. But that's all in the past.
Burke now uses the Canada Video Relay Service (VRS) — a national telecommunication service that allows people who are deaf or hard of hearing to make direct phone calls to anyone in North America. He said it has changed his life forever. "I remember my first call. It was so clear. I was so happy and thankful," Burke said. "I feel more equal to the hearing population." David Burke, who is deaf, says new technology known as Canada Video Relay Service has changed his life forever. (Submitted by David Burke) Burke said deaf people prefer to use their first language — which is usually sign language — instead of their second language because they're more comfortable signing and communicating that way.
According to Canada VRS's website, interpreters are available to provide services in four languages: ASL, LSQ, English and French. He said text and email don't allow for the same freedom of communication. VRS is the closest he's ever come to speaking directly with the hearing community. "For me, I have my computer open and there is a video that I see the interpreter who has a headset on in order to communicate [with the person on the phone] and can be hands-free in order to communicate with me. The interpreter can see me signing and I can see them signing and they can hear [the person] speaking and [the person] can hear them speaking." VRS was introduced across Canada in 2017.
Today it has over 300 certified interpreters and over 7,000 registered users. It's available 24/7, year-round. It allows the user to make and receive phone calls, as well as take and leave messages. Battle for better communication Diane Underschultz, a community outreach specialist for Canada VRS, said this technology has been widely available in the U.S. for over 25 years but it was a bit of an uphill battle to bring it to Canada. "The deaf community tried to advocate with the [Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission] and they were the one's kind of rebelling against it," Underschultz said. "It was all about the money." But the community didn't give up.
Underschultz says the Canadian Association of the Deaf spent over a decade in negotiations with the arm's-length federal telecommunications regulators before finally gaining approval and funding. Now, the national commission provides funding for private call centres to hire certified interpreters. For deaf users, the service is completely free. All they need is a device and a connection to the internet.
An apprentice engineer who was worried his hearing loss would hold him back is encouraging other disabled people to apply for apprenticeships.
Ben Hamblett from Wrexham is an electrical and electronic engineering apprentice with ACE Lifts and works in a small team wiring lift component units. The 28-year old achieved a HNC in Engineering at Glyndŵr University after leaving school but struggled to get into employment for five years, which resulted in him suffering from low confidence and anxiety. Ben said: “I was worried about the future and not being in work. It reached the point where I knew I needed support, so I contacted a charity for help. They were really useful and gave me practical advice on making phone calls to potential employers, interviewing techniques and how to state my disability on a job application.”
It was important for Ben to find an employer that would be supportive towards his deafness and advice to help him identify a list of potential employers. Ben added: “We found a company called ACE Lifts advertising engineering jobs. I was nervous about applying because some companies can have misconceptions about deaf people being a health and safety risk in the workplace - especially in engineering roles.” The job he had applied for involved working down a lift shaft where he would be required to follow the instructions of a colleague who would be positioned at the top of the lift.
Ben, who in his spare time enjoys producing music, said: “I went to meet ACE Lifts for an informal chat and during this, I realised that the role wasn’t suited for me as I may not have been able to hear the instructions. It was obviously disappointing but then they mentioned a Level 3 electrical and electronic engineering apprenticeship that was live and offered me a two-day work trial. “After the trial, I was offered an apprenticeship role. I was shocked when I got the call but overjoyed that I finally got a job after years of searching. I’m now nearly a year into my apprenticeship and I’m really enjoying it and have regained my confidence,’
Eastenders favourite Rita Simons has shared a jaw-dropping video of her deaf daughter Maiya singing note-perfect in an amazing stage performance. [Note she finished in the soap opera some time ago]. When she first told everyone she was having her daughter implanted she was viciously attacked by born deaf, who called her a child abuser. It's sad the deaf community still allows the hating deaf any mileage at all.
Rita, who played Roxy Mitchell in the BBC One soap, revealed she was "going against" her parent rule of shading her kids from the limelight, because of her sheer pride. Rita Simons has shared an amazing video of her deaf daughter singing.
Rita Simons has shared an amazing video of her deaf daughter singing. Maiya, aged six, is profoundly deaf in her right ear and partially deaf in her left ear yet belted out an amazing rendition of Spotlight, a tune from musical Everybody's Talking About Jamie. She was diagnosed with the condition aged just five months. Rita, 42, hailed herself a "proud mama" as she uploaded the scenes which captured Maiya working the stage in sheer delight.
The 10 year old's face beamed in delight as she sang the tune, complete with facial expressions fitting to the theatrical track. Rita hailed herself a 'proud mama' at witnessing twin Maiya's performance. Rita's eldest daughter was diagnosed at just five months. Rita accompanied the touching video with a lengthy caption, in which she wrote: "I don’t normally put too many pics of my kids on social media but I am going against my rule this to show all you parents of deaf kids out there that #cochlearimplant CAN change your child’s life.
"Maiya is almost profoundly deaf. Without her processor, she hears nothing. "She was implanted six years ago and this was her last night singing a song from the show I’m in right now."
Monday, 30 September 2019
How the UK deaf approach the right way to debate things, would YOU join via these rules? And they wonder why Brexit and the EU issue still isn't addressed. The site which ATR WON'T put a link to, claims to be the UK sole real news and feedback deaf site in the UK (And the tablets are working just fine thanks). This actually IS from a real UK deaf site.
Getting in touch:
Private messages to moderators regarding muting, being blocked or removal of comments/posts will be ignored.
[Basically, you cannot complain if they edit your posts or reject via OWN own personal opinion or you are banned].
If you have any further questions or concerns about moderation, feel free to ask in a post, we usually are happy to discuss it publicly even if we can't reach an agreement - be prepared to back up any concerns though.
[Collectively they will use the site and their supporters to discredit you if you oppose or contradict them]
BUT bear in mind that persistent bad faith complaints about moderation or moderators may result in moderation action being taken against you. We are doing this in a voluntary capacity.
[So if you do not like what we say or do that is bad faith, and you are out too].
If you do need to contact the moderators about anything, be descriptive and state what the issue is clearly. Please allow moderators sufficient time to respond - we have a life to live, it is not a 24/7 chat support. If we aren't lucky enough to be on your friends list, we may not even notice you have messaged us for some time. That's Facebook for you, not us.
The report function is not a guarantee that something will be done - moderators may decide no further action is required after reviewing a user submitted report.
[We reserve the right to ignore you anyway].
Comments or submissions which call for/incite violence or threaten direct-action against political figures, journalists, members and media personalities in a way that constitutes illegal harassment or intimidation may result in a permanent ban and may be reported to the authorities.
Moderators do post their own personal views and partake in all debates freely within the rules of the group, the same as any other members.
[And if you disagree then again we retain the right to get rid of you, we don't do 'neutral'].
Robust debate is encouraged, angry arguments are not. This group is for people with a wide variety of views, and as such you will come across content, views and people you don't agree with. Political views from a wide spectrum are tolerated here.
[We refer you back to the Moderator right if we don't agree you are out].
Persistent engagement in bad faith or antagonistic, uncivil or abusive behaviour will result in action being taken against your comments/post or even membership.
Comments and submissions that contribute nothing more than personal insults or group based attacks will be removed. Persistent harassment targeted at other members will result in moderation action being taken including a permaban.
Gaslighting or straw man argument or ad hominem arguments etc aren't helpful or constructive. Don't do it.
[Don't ask us what 'Ad hominem' is, it's just another way of blocking you if we don't understand.]
Anything not specifically concerning politics in the UK/EU or geopolitics involving the UK/EU will not be approved. In the rare instances we may let in international news that is of sufficient interest. If you want to do that, explain in the post why you're posting it.
Posts should be used as an invitation to discussion, not an opportunity to soapbox, tub-thump or showboat.
[Only what we view is admissable will be, it's our site and don't you forget it.]
If you see racist, homophobic etc comments please report them. Taking issue with immigration or refugee policy is not automatically racist. This does not open the door to make it about any specific group of people based on their nationality, belief, colour of skin etc.
[So you cannot be racist but you can/will be viewed that if you mention race, immigrant or colour etc.]
News articles older than one week will usually be rejected. If an older article has relevance to events being discussed today, you should outline this argument in the same post that links to said article. On days where events move particularly fast, moderators may rejected outdated news regardless of age. We also may reject posts if we're aware the same article already exist in the group.
[However that rule applies to MEMBERS, it does not apply to the moderators, who can reproduce articles from 1998 if they want to.]
Long-form journalism published more than twelve months prior or before significant developments to the topic it discusses should be submitted as part of a self-post detailing why it is relevant today. Articles from paywalled sites should be linked to directly, and a copy/paste, screenshot or outline.com link provided in the comments. Full credit to the author and publication should be given. Some websites may have different conditions applied due to copyright issues or differences in the design of their paywall.
POSTING TWITTER OR FACEBOOK LINKS.
They are acceptable, so long as they are from journalists, pollsters, politicians and so forth. Tweets from random members of the public are not, but maybe approved depending on context and notability.
[Moderator social links CAN be included].
Facebook posts/Twitter tweets which do not contribute substance or contain reactionary commentary regardless of author will generally be removed as "hot takes"
Twitter threads should be submitted as a link submission identifying the Twitter thread in the title where possible. The contents of a thread should be posted as a text comment or link to an appropriate Thread Reader url.
Facebook posts/Twitter tweets that are just a link to an article and contain no commentary of substance will be removed. Said articles should submitted in place of the tweet with the accompanying tweet linked to in the comments.
Other social media sources or accounts that don't fit the criteria will continue to be reviewed manually.
Submitting your own content is perfectly fine, but make it clear that it's your own content and meet the rules of group.
[Again we refer you back to Moderator rulings on what is viable posting, and that means you have to satisfy all of them, and any single moderator can still block].
All images with any form of claims that have no sources to back it up (valid links) in it will be rejected. No exceptions (See Fake News below).
Fake news is heavily frowned on and is a danger to a healthy functioning democracy. We will automatically reject all links from all known fake news sites such as Breitbart, Infowars, Westmonster etc. The moderation team will always try to recognise and remove fake news. We may not always get it right, please report any that we have gotten wrong.
[What IS fake news depends on what the moderators think is or isn't since all media posts can be viewed biased or fake anyway. Quoting as the moderators do from various media sources is OK but they retain the right to block you doing it, if the media you quoted challenges their view.]
It is helpful to follow guides on recognising fake news (hint: news that you don't agree with isn't "fake news"), here are some to get you started:
These rules are not exhaustive, moderators reserve the right to moderate (or not) where it is felt to be appropriate. Past moderation decisions are no guarantee of future mod decisions. Rules are subject to change without notice.
Basically...don't be an arsehole :)
Donald John Trump is strictly forbidden from joining. ;)
Thank you for reading. Please enjoy this group. As always ensure your medication is up to date, and get your carers/parents permission first.
He wrote 'War of the World's' as well didn't he! And he wrote without current knowledge of choices, DNA, and genetics.
H.G. Wells, with his acute sense of ethical dilemmas in science, wrote a short story in 1904 about disability, “The Country of the Blind”. In it, an explorer discovers a remote valley in the Andes where everyone is blind.
Thinking himself superior, he tries to teach the villagers about sight, but they scoff at him. What’s more, in many respects he is inferior. Eventually, to be allowed to marry the girl he loves, he agrees to have his eyes plucked out. But his courage fails him at the last minute and he flees. While blindness does not have defenders as a normal way of life, deafness does.
There is a growing body of literature to support the right of deaf parents to use pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) to select for deaf children. Jacqueline Mae Wallis, a philosopher at the University of Bristol (UK), contends in the journal Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy that this is morally permissible. “Selection for deafness, with deafness understood as mere-difference and valued for its cultural identity, need not necessitate impermissible moral harms,” she writes. For most people this sounds implausible, but she counters the most common objections handily.
Will the child be harmed? Not necessarily. It might even be good for a child to be deaf. They will be able to learn a signed language; they will be more sensitive to “enhanced visual and vibrational qualia experiences”. Will it restrict future life plans? Not necessarily. “Deaf advocates can reply that being deaf opens future life plans that being hearing cannot, and that families who seek to choose deafness for their child do not view this as a limitation.” In fact, a hearing child born to deaf parents might find life more difficult. Will it introduce harm into the world? Not necessarily.
“Every reproductive decision will plausibly introduce some harm into the world,” Wallis writes. “Every child’s life will include some limited opportunities and suffering, determined by climate, politics, socioeconomic status, biology, etc Much of the author’s argument flows from the insights of disability theorist Elizabeth Barnes. She argues that disability is merely difference: “having a disability makes you physically non-standard, but it doesn’t (by itself or automatically) make you worse off.” And as Wallis points out, “Contrary to what the bad-difference view suggests about their disabilities, most people with disabilities do not describe themselves as suboptimal, deficient, dysfunctional, etc. but rather as healthy, whole, functional, etc.”
Therefore, she concludes in this provocative article, “some families may have good, morally-grounded reasons for selecting genetic deafness for a future child.” H.G. Wells would have approved.
Medical student, 25, uses a special Bluetooth stethoscope (and patients love her folding cane) Alexandra Adams, 25, is training to be a doctor despite being deaf and blind.
The fourth-year student was previously pegged to be a paralympic swimmer Miss Adams makes use of a specially made stethoscope to examine her patients. On her first day working on the ward, a doctor asked Alexandra Adams why she was walking around with a patient's cane. After explaining it was actually hers, the deaf and blind medical student was told not to touch any patients – then sent home.
Now in her fourth year at university, Miss Adams, 25, has refused to let her disabilities hold her back from becoming a doctor. 'It has always been that if someone told me I couldn't do something, I would go out of my way to prove I could,' she said. 'I can do cannulation, take blood, catheterise [and] spot rashes.' Born deaf in both ears, and with vision of less than 5 per cent in her left eye and none in her right. Alexandra is now in her fourth year of study on her way to becoming a fully qualified doctor.
She relies on touch to feel for veins, adding: 'You can pick up a lot about patients just by listening to them. Patient safety is paramount so if I'm doubting something, or I'm unsure, I always ask someone.' Miss Adams had been due to represent GB as a swimmer at the 2012 Paralympics but was hospitalised aged 16 with acid reflux. She told The Sunday Times that stomach surgery went 'very wrong', forcing her to have more than 20 operations and stay in the hospital for 18 months.
The experience saw her switch her focus from swimming to medicine – and she duly enrolled to study the subject at Cardiff University. She says being a patient taught her the value of empathy. 'I've been able to go up to patients who've been terrified, and I just draw the curtains and say, 'I know how you feel'.