Using sign language and captions. The only problem as I can see is signed access is almost impossible to lip-read. Without criticising individual interpreters, a lot do not lip-speak at ALL most of the time there is exaggerated face-pulling etc which is more suitable for a child than an adult who would not use an Interpreter that did that. The image is negative and in most part reflecting adversely ON deaf people.
Deaf need support, not theatrics. A lot simply fail to speak as well as some 'sop' to deaf culture, but that is sidelining the dedicated lip-reader, which is curious given recent heavy campaigns demanding masks FOR lip-readers, and the claim all deaf now lip-read not sign, perhaps lip-speaking should be a norm with sign language?
Of course, nobody is going to watch the mouth patterns or the sign language, with captioning, but the few, which suggests both mediums are heading for obscurity and rarity media-wise. I didn't watch any of the sign on the AOHL updates or the BDA's because captions are there. The more we read the less we lip-read or sign. 888 is the number one prime access to media above all other modes deaf use.
It's a well-known issue in BSL circles, who tend to refuse to caption personal output because they know what happens. A lot is done quite deliberately to promote deaf culture and sign language and if viewers follow captions they aren't going to follow culture or sign. I feel they are fighting a losing battle as most deaf are insisting on captions, and even some stating they can not follow sign without it.
90%+ BSL interpreters are unqualified and unregistered to lip-speak at all. There are issues with some BSL interpreters claiming to be lip-speakers too, but are not registered in that capacity. So where did all these sudden demands for lip-reading come from? It could not have been the deaf. I rely on captions but the reality of daily life means I need people to speak properly. No charity concerned with the awareness of deaf or hard of hearing actually provides a lip-speaker.
The consensus of opinion is both lip-reading and BSL are always going to be minority means to follow and only then viable via continued external 3rd party support. Yet, 10m in the UK with hearing loss have rejected BSL as a means of communication themselves, and the ongoing frustrations at the lack of lip-reading tuitional success is hampering that approach also.
Captions/text have already succeeded in relegating BSL and lip-reading to the sidelines. Technology appears to have provided the solutions most with hearing loss prefer and medical advances limiting the number of deaf people requiring either mode.