Complaints no sign language access was being offered, seems to have missed the point it was a seminar for HEARING parents and Hearing support professionals of the deaf. Being global BSL would not have carried either. Deaf activism still fails to understand they have no voice to raise, and no rights, regarding other people's deaf children, nor to oppose what approaches are used to educate them, or to attack various approaches and alleviations, parents choose to assist their children.
Unlike deaf activists, parents don't see their job as providing future signing members for their community or for promoting sign language or its culture, it is about the right of parents to choose what they believe is the best for their children. That might be some sign it may not. These constant 'digs' at areas who don't promote BSL or ASL do nothing to change a parental view that others are trying to interfere in their child's upbringing.
The idea to provide signed support to an area that probably doesn't use it predominantly seems to have gone over the activists head too. The purpose of using sign at an educational seminar about tuition is to promote sign not assist parental decision making. Since the seminar was NOT about deaf rights on sign language, why include it? Seems the activists are also unaware of the role of sign in deaf education too.
Quoting Milan was silly! Sign is not an established norm or legal UK educational right yet, and unlikely to be without the approval of the parent and again, the state is unlikely to approve of a 'Deaf' campaign that overrules the parent, or, oppose its own inclusion stance that is against immersional signed education. What works is used and that is how it should be. Bearing in mind the need to access the hearing world not just the deaf one.
Hence why the seminar is not there to 'promote' BSL. Not least because the base is not there to make it work. The support is not there for translation, the teachers aren't there, the schools are no longer there etc. Immersive BSL education has no track record, and we doubt parents are going to approve of a system untried and their children used as guinea pigs. The only 'proof' of immersive sign 'success' is via the ADULT community, and that is in disarray, and their deaf schools virtually extinct. Let us face it, 83% rely on captions anyway. BSL activism doesn't fess up to the fact they advocate deaf cannot read or understand captions, because they are relentless BSL grammar promoters.
They oppose English, and just how MANY deaf are 'incensed' this seminar didn't provide BSL? knew about it? or would have attended it? Probably next to none.